Argumentative Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Argumentative - search Paper ExampleThis essay will argue in support of the points and concerns raised by the cause by citing evidence from credible scholarly sources. It was anti-Semitism and fervent nationalism that consolidated government say-so of German, Italian and Chinese populations respectively in the bygone era. In todays geo-political situation, terrorism is the almost discussed issue in public discourse. Ever since the September 11, 2001 attacks on America, it has been a major pre-occupation of American diplomatic and armament efforts. Since the United States is the leader of the prevailing uni-polar world, terrorism now has implications for all countries associated with it. In the context of the on-going War on Terror, the concept of Islamist jihad is seen as the ideological springboard for the numerous suicide attacks witnessed recently. As a measure to retaliate and prevent terror attacks, America and its allies adopt initiated several counter-terror trading o perations in perceived geo-political hotspots. To complement these efforts, the scale and scope of counter-intelligence operations are also upped. (Mcgrath, 2004, p.147) But the destination counter-intelligence darkly reminds the reader of the CoIntelPro regime of the Cold War period, where the state abused its power to keep a check on citizen freedoms. Curbing civil liberties under whatever guise is seldom a reform-minded move, as examples from past and present clearly show Tyrants place populations under surveillance because that is a hot flash means of control. The Gestapo, the NKVD, the KGB, the Stasi, and the Chinese Politburo all requisitioned private data such as medical, banking, and library come ins now, with the Internet, Chinese government activity track citizens computer use. One reason dictators demand access to such private data is that this interrogation breaks down citizens sense of being able to act freely against those in power (Wolf, Chapter 5, p.81) While c ounter-terrorism and counter-intelligence operations might have legitimate causes in certain exceptional cases, today it has come to represent hegemony and power. The record of the United States, especially under eight year reign of George W. Bush speaks ill of the notion of counter-intelligence. Interrogators operative on the War on Terror project have resorted to such dehumanizing tactics such as solitary confinement in nudity in order to elicit intelligence information from suspects. Interrogators were learnt to have imposed nudity as a way of inducing learned helplessness which is akin to the mental subjugation of American public to the domination and control by the elite business and political class. The Obama government activity continued this tactic with Pfc. Bradley Manning. Whistle-blowers are being held naked in solitary confinement, while our political establishment, a complicit media, and a professional class of lawyers and behavioral scientists attempt to veil Ameri can atrocities. Current targeted assassinations of American citizens, landmines, torture, and military tribunals sadly converge with the Bush-Cheney era policy of war andcounter-terrorism. (Glazier, 2009, p.957) The dangers of indirect censorship and control articulated by Noami Wolf are easier to understand when we study the implications of recent legislations. For example, under George W. Bushs reign, the Foreign Intelligence